Mountfield 1530H vs Stiga 7102 W
A metric, sourced head-to-head. Each row marks the objectively better figure; blanks are specs neither maker publishes, never guesses. Price shows in GBP where sourced.
Quick verdict
Stiga 7102 W leads on 3 of the 4 directly comparable specs. That's a spec-sheet tally, not a scored review — the right pick still depends on what matters for your garden (see each model's strengths below).
Mountfield 1530H
- lawns up to roughly 1 acre
- easier pedal-operated hydrostatic driving
- rear collection (240 L) emptied without leaving the seat
Stiga 7102 W
- large lawns needing a wide 102 cm cut
- high-capacity collection (300 L) with a twin-cylinder engine
- hydrostatic comfort on bigger plots
Specification by specification
| Spec | Mountfield 1530H | Stiga 7102 W |
|---|---|---|
| Working area | 4000 m² | Not specified |
| Cutting width | 84 cm | 102 cm best |
| Engine size | 432 cc | 708 cc best |
| Grass box | 240 L | 300 L best |
| Weight | 191 kg best | 238 kg |
| Cutting height | 25–80 mm | 30–90 mm |
| Price | £2,599 | £3,899 |